<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source may Create Security Risks for Mobile Phones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/02/15/open-source-may-create-security-risks-for-mobile-phones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/02/15/open-source-may-create-security-risks-for-mobile-phones/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marko</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/02/15/open-source-may-create-security-risks-for-mobile-phones/#comment-387052</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/02/15/open-source-may-create-security-risks-for-mobile-phones/#comment-387052</guid>
		<description>MobileCrunch: please delete this article. It is FUD and complete bullocks. For one, Linux is way more secure than Windows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MobileCrunch: please delete this article. It is FUD and complete bullocks. For one, Linux is way more secure than Windows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/02/15/open-source-may-create-security-risks-for-mobile-phones/#comment-386241</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/02/15/open-source-may-create-security-risks-for-mobile-phones/#comment-386241</guid>
		<description>This is a ridiculous scare tactic by carriers and anti-virus manufacturers. Open source software has never proven itself to be more vulnerable to attack on any other platform. Why would  mobile be any different? On the contrary, proprietary systems like Windows are infected far more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a ridiculous scare tactic by carriers and anti-virus manufacturers. Open source software has never proven itself to be more vulnerable to attack on any other platform. Why would  mobile be any different? On the contrary, proprietary systems like Windows are infected far more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cintra</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/02/15/open-source-may-create-security-risks-for-mobile-phones/#comment-385455</link>
		<dc:creator>cintra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2008/02/15/open-source-may-create-security-risks-for-mobile-phones/#comment-385455</guid>
		<description>Well I'm sorry but I can't help but feel that this is rubbish, and I am a user of F-secure on S60.. a wasted investment I fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m sorry but I can&#8217;t help but feel that this is rubbish, and I am a user of F-secure on S60.. a wasted investment I fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
