<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. 9th Circuit Protects Privacy of workers’ Text Messages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/06/19/us-9th-circuit-protects-privacy-of-workers%e2%80%99-text-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/06/19/us-9th-circuit-protects-privacy-of-workers%e2%80%99-text-messages/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Kullman</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/06/19/us-9th-circuit-protects-privacy-of-workers%e2%80%99-text-messages/#comment-419468</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kullman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/?p=3243#comment-419468</guid>
		<description>I haven't read the decision, so I don't know how far the privacy protections go. Sometimes disclaimers can cover a naked ass, like in some product liability cases. But a legal philosophical question arises. You can put a warning label on hamburger meat warning consumers that it must be refrigerated, but the people who don’t already know this are probable too stupid to be able to read the warning!  My guess is the 9th Circuit is protecting dumb employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read the decision, so I don&#8217;t know how far the privacy protections go. Sometimes disclaimers can cover a naked ass, like in some product liability cases. But a legal philosophical question arises. You can put a warning label on hamburger meat warning consumers that it must be refrigerated, but the people who don’t already know this are probable too stupid to be able to read the warning!  My guess is the 9th Circuit is protecting dumb employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/06/19/us-9th-circuit-protects-privacy-of-workers%e2%80%99-text-messages/#comment-419438</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/?p=3243#comment-419438</guid>
		<description>John:  The Quon case may give employers incentive to use multiple, repetitive privacy disclaimers.  What do you think?  --Ben  &lt;a href="http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/06/employee-imtexte-mailvoicecomputerinter.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/06/employee-imtexte-mailvoicecomputerinter.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:  The Quon case may give employers incentive to use multiple, repetitive privacy disclaimers.  What do you think?  &#8211;Ben  <a href="http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/06/employee-imtexte-mailvoicecomputerinter.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/hack-igations.blogspot.com');">http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/06/employee-imtexte-mailvoicecomputerinter.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
